Visitor:
great grandparent > grandparent > parent
Defending My Support of an Abortion

Defending My Support of an Abortion

"Compassion is the basis of morality."
- Schopenhauer

This week, I received two hate mail letters from people who assumed that they knew me. Why, they demanded to know, do I believe in animal rights while ignoring the rights of unborn children? In their arguments, both correctly guessed by my last name that I am Jewish, and based upon my geographical location, lived in the ultra-liberal New York metropolitan  area, and based upon the admission that I voted for Obama for President, came to the conclusion that I must support abortion.

Perhaps the letters came to me as the result of a question that will appear on the ballot of Mississippi's general election tomorrow, November 8th. The proposed "Personhood Amendment" defines an individual's life as beginning at the moment of fertilization. Colorado voters have defeated similar votes in the past, but support has been growing by anti-abortionists in Florida, Ohio, and South Dakota where the controversy will continue on ballots in 2012.

The animal rights movement supports the murder of unborn children. Most of its members are liberal feminists who demand a woman's right to make that painful life or death decision about a future being.

Having three daughters, I freely admit that I am more of a feminist than most feminists, but I digress...

The animal rights movement also promotes compassionate slaughter of animals, and, in doing so, insures that more animals are to be slaughtered and eaten.

When the goal of a movement changes to contradict its founding principles, we reach that point in time when that mission should be aborted. It is in that spirit that I believe in abortions. In its current state, the animal rights movement is dead and must be ripped from the body of injustices which men and women of conscience continue to protest. In its place, we must pray for the birth of a new movement that supports the rights of all living creatures, even humans.

Animal rights activists protest pain to laboratory rats, but support a woman's right to an abortion. Some demand that meat eaters acknowledge the horrors of slaughterhouse films, or vivisection, or bullfighting. Yet, they turn a deaf ear and firmly shut a blind eye to the conscious being who grows within the human mother.

Each year, one thousand or more animal rights supporters gather near Washington, D.C. for their annual convention. The majority of these activists are women. As a matter of fact, there would be no animal rights movement without the gentler sex, who seem to possess a spirituality and wisdom that their male counterparts lack.

Most of these passionate women also support the rights of women. That's a natural. More than one female author has paralleled the abuse and struggles of animals to the sexual politics and multiple indignities suffered by women at the
hands of a male-oriented society.

Is abortion murder? Of course it is. It is more than just murder. It is death without compassion, for the living creature, not yet named, possesses pain receptors and is aware of his or her own suffering.

In defense of their ignorance, some animal rights activists argue that the fetus feels no pain, much the same way that animal abusers use the very same argument to defend vivisection, sport, or the consumption of sentient farm
animals.

As an animal rights activist, I am faced with an enormous dilemma. Do I call abortion anything else than murder? I cannot rationalize murder, for that is exactly what it is. Murder, without regard for the human who will die in great
pain. Abortion is murder.

I cry for the cow and the calf, and the bull in the bullring, and the dog who is euthanized, and the rat who is burned in the name of science, and the squirrel
shot by the young boy in the name of sport, and the coyote who is anally electrocuted so that her fur can adorn a parka.

Many people do not recognize the unborn child as possessing the same rights as the rest of us, yet, a study published in the May, 2003 issue of Psychological Science (2003;14:220-224) reveals that a fetal infant is able to recognize the voice of her own mother.

Scientific studies have demonstrated that the growing human fetus feels pain and learns about the external environment while within. The fetus recognizes songs and voices. The brain works, the heart beats, pain receptors feel. How much compassion do animal rights activists emote for sentient human infants, not yet born?

Supporting animal research is a transgression of the laws of nature and an insult to the respect of life. This is why Animal Rights activists are so right in the things they protest. Supporting abortion for just one of the 4,700 species of mammals is a contradiction in terms against all of the good. In 1866, one of America's first great intellectual feminists, Ellen G. White, wrote in book 3 of How to Live:
"Against every transgression of the laws of life, nature will utter her protest. She bears abuse as long as she can; but finally the retribution comes, and it falls upon the mental as well as the physical powers."

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com
http://www.Twitter.com/TheRealNotmilk


Fair Use Notice and Disclaimer
Send questions or comments about this web site to Ann Berlin, annxtberlin@gmail.com