|
Fallacy: Appeal to Popularity
Also Known as: Ad Populum
The Appeal to Popularity has the following form:
- Most people approve of X (have favorable emotions towards X).
- Therefore X is true.
The basic idea is that a claim is accepted as being true simply because most
people are favorably inclined towards the claim. More formally, the fact that
most people have favorable emotions associated with the claim is substituted in
place of actual evidence for the claim. A person falls prey to this fallacy if
he accepts a claim as being true simply because most other people approve of the
claim.
It is clearly fallacious to accept the approval of the majority as evidence
for a claim. For example, suppose that a skilled speaker managed to get most
people to absolutely love the claim that 1+1=3. It would still not be rational
to accept this claim simply because most people approved of it. After all, mere
approval is no substitute for a mathematical proof. At one time people approved
of claims such as "the world is flat", "humans cannot survive at speeds greater
than 25 miles per hour", "the sun revolves around the earth" but all these
claims turned out to be false.
This sort of "reasoning" is quite common and can be quite an effective
persuasive device. Since most humans tend to conform with the views of the
majority, convincing a person that the majority approves of a claim is often an
effective way to get him to accept it. Advertisers often use this tactic when
they attempt to sell products by claiming that everyone uses and loves their
products. In such cases they hope that people will accept the (purported)
approval of others as a good reason to buy the product.
This fallacy is vaguely similar to such fallacies as
Appeal to
Belief and Appeal
to Common Practice. However, in the case of an Ad Populum the appeal is to
the fact that most people approve of a claim. In the case of an
Appeal to
Belief, the appeal is to the fact that most people believe a claim. In the
case of an Appeal
to Common Practice, the appeal is to the fact that many people take the
action in question.
This fallacy is closely related to the Appeal to
Emotion fallacy, as discussed in the entry for that fallacy.
- "My fellow Americans...there has been some talk that the government is
overstepping its bounds by allowing police to enter peoples' homes without the
warrants traditionally required by the Constitution. However, these are
dangerous times and dangerous times require appropriate actions. I have in my
office thousands of letters from people who let me know, in no uncertain
terms, that they heartily endorse the war against crime in these United
States. Because of this overwhelming approval, it is evident that the police
are doing the right thing."
- "I read the other day that most people really like the new gun control
laws. I was sort of suspicious of them, but I guess if most people like them,
then they must be okay."
- Jill and Jane have some concerns that the rules their sorority has set are
racist in character. Since Jill is a decent person, she brings her concerns up
in the next meeting. The president of the sorority assures her that there is
nothing wrong with the rules, since the majority of the sisters like them.
Jane accepts this ruling but Jill decides to leave the sorority.
|